Streamers / VALORANT_EMEA / Insights
VALORANT_EMEA — streaming insights
791.9K followers · mostly streams VALORANT
When does VALORANT_EMEA pull the most viewers — and where is room to grow? Based on hourly concurrent-viewer samples over the last 56 days.
When their viewers show up
Overall median: 5.5K concurrent viewers
Median viewers by weekday
Days follow the UTC calendar.
Median viewers by hour
UTC.
Viewer trend by month
Aug +2% vs Jul
Median and sampled peak concurrent viewers per calendar month — growing, flat or cooling at a glance.
Tracking started July 23, 2026 — earlier months only show what the onboarding backfill could recover.
Follower growth
Daily follower counts. Twitch shares subscriber and unique-viewer numbers only with the broadcaster, so follower growth — and followers gained per streamed hour — is the closest honest read on how well streams convert viewers into an audience.
Last 7 days
-227
followers
Last 30 days
-946
followers
Category performance
Sorted by hours observed — the categories VALORANT_EMEA actually lives in come first.
| Category | Median viewers | Vs. typical channel | Hours observed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VALORANT▲ Trending25 h observed · +33% vs typical channel | 5.5K | +33% | 25 |
“Vs. typical channel” compares VALORANT_EMEA's median with the category's average viewers per live tracked channel over 28 days. Big channels pull that average up, so small streamers land below 0% in most categories — compare across rows, not against zero.
Games to try
Categories that VALORANT streamers also play, ranked by viewers per live channel.
Consistency & benchmark
Schedule reliability
reliable
- Sticks to announced times 100% of the time (20 announced streams scored)
- Typically starts 30 min early
Size benchmark
Top 21%
of channels with over 100k followers by median concurrent viewers.
How this is measured
Concurrent viewers are sampled once per hour while the channel is live on Twitch (25 samples in the last 56 days). Medians describe observed hours only — a quiet cell means “not observed”, not “nobody watched”. Peaks between samples are missed, so true peaks run higher than shown.